| 186 | 0 | 142 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为解决现有卷积神经网络识别桥梁细小裂缝时存在精度低、受环境影响大等问题,提出一种融合语义分割和边缘提取的DEGUNet桥梁裂缝识别方法。首先通过改进传统Canny边缘检测算法,计算图像在多个方向上的梯度幅值,以增强模型的几何敏感度;其次构建动态门控模块并集成于U-Net模型各层级跳跃连接处,提升模型获取多层次裂缝边缘特征的能力;最后结合通道-空间注意力机制以残差连接的方式融入模型解码器结构,提高裂缝检测的精度。将所提方法与VGG-16模型和U-Net模型在相同数据集中进行训练测试,结果表明:所提方法裂缝识别精确率为93.76%,较VGG-16模型和U-Net模型分别提升了19.48个百分点和6.31个百分点;裂缝分割平均交并比为72.35%,相比VGG-16模型和U-Net模型分别提高了10.51个百分点和4.32个百分点。另外,在未参与训练的皮山河大桥数据集中,裂缝识别精确率为92.12%、F1分数91.92%,召回率91.73%,裂缝分割的平均像素精准度为80.69%,平均交并比为87.38%。因此,本研究提出的DEGUNet网络能够准确分割并识别桥梁细小裂缝,同时在复杂性环境下表现出良好的鲁棒性。
Abstract:In order to solve the problems of low accuracy and great environmental influence when existing convolutional neural networks are used to identify small cracks in bridges, a bridge crack identification method based on DEGUNet integrating semantic segmentation and edge extraction is proposed. Firstly, the traditional Canny edge detection algorithm is improved to calculate the gradient amplitude of the image in multiple directions to enhance the geometric sensitivity of the model. Secondly, a dynamic gating module is constructed and integrated into the jump connections of each level of U-Net to enhance the model's ability to obtain multi-level crack edge features. Finally, the channel-spatial attention mechanism is integrated into the model decoder structure in the form of residual connection to improve the accuracy of crack detection. The proposed method was trained and tested on the same dataset with the VGG-16 model and the U-Net model. The results showed that the crack identification accuracy of the proposed method was 93.76%, which was 19.48 percentage points and 6.31 percentage points higher than those of the VGG-16 model and the U-Net model, respectively.The mean intersection over union of crack segmentation is 72.35%, which was 10.51 percentage points and 4.32 percentage points higher than those of the VGG-16 model and U-Net model, respectively. In addition, in the Pishan River Bridge dataset that did not participate in the training, the accuracy of crack identification was 92.12%, the F1 score was 91.92%, the recall rate was 91.73%, the mean pixel accuracy of crack segmentation was 80.69%, and the mean intersection over union was 87.38%. The DEGUNet network proposed in this study can accurately segment and identify small cracks in bridges, while showing good robustness in complex environments.
[1] LI Y,ZHANG J H,GUAN Z G,et al.Experimental study on the correlation between crack width and crack depth of RC beams[J].Materials,2021,14(20):5950.
[2] 殷鹏程,龙清春,单德山,等.桥梁健康监测数据的质量评估方法研究[J].公路工程,2024,49(2):1-6,45.
[3] 孟庆成,李明健,万达,等.基于M-Unet的混凝土裂缝实时分割算法[J].土木与环境工程学(中英文),2024,46(1):215-222.
[4] 刘宇飞,樊健生,聂建国,等.结构表面裂缝数字图像法识别研究综述与前景展望[J].土木工程学报,2021,54(6):79-98.
[5] LI G,HE S H,JU Y F,et al.Long-distance precision inspection method for bridge cracks with image processing[J].Automation in Construction,2014,41:83-95.
[6] 阮小丽,钟建平,吴巨峰,等.基于无人机的桥梁外露面裂缝识别系统研究[J].湖南交通科技,2023,49(3):104-108,114.
[7] 邓露,褚鸿鹄,龙砺芝,等.基于深度学习的土木基础设施裂缝检测综述[J].中国公路学报,2023,36(2):1-21.
[8] 岳清瑞,徐刚,刘晓刚.桥梁裂缝智能识别与监测方法研究[J].中国公路学报,2024,37(2):16-28.
[9] 王睿,漆泰岳.基于机器视觉检测的裂缝特征研究[J].土木工程学报,2016,49(7):123-128.
[10] 韩晓健,赵志成.基于计算机视觉技术的结构表面裂缝检测方法研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(增刊1):418-427.
[11] 周颖,刘彤.基于计算机视觉的混凝土裂缝识别[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(9):1277-1285.
[12] LIU Z Q,CAO Y W,WANG Y Z,et al.Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using U-Net fully convolutional networks[J].Automation in Construction,2019,104:129-139.
[13] 唐永,么学春,王晨,等.基于无人机图像技术和支持向量机(SVM)的桥梁裂缝自动识别系统[J].公路工程,2024,49(6):49-56.
[14] 张伟,周利君,夏坚.基于改进Canny算子的建筑裂缝边缘提取方法[J].福建工程学院学报,2021,19(4):330-334.
[15] 张绪伦.建筑墙体外表面裂缝信息快速提取技术研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2022.[A37]
[16] 马亚飞,孙文康,何羽,等.基于DC-Unet的混凝土桥梁表观裂缝识别方法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(3):66-75.
[17] QU F,WANG B K,ZHU Q,et al.Toward enhancing concrete crack segmentation accuracy under complex scenarios:a novel modified U-Net network[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2024,83(31):76935-76952.
[18] HE Z S,SU C,DENG Y C.A novel MO-YOLOv4 for segmentation of multi-class bridge damages[J].Advanced Engineering Informatics,2024,62:102586.
[19] 黄彩萍,田旺源,李青.基于U-Net和数学形态学的混凝土桥梁病害定量识别方法研究[J].桥梁建设,2025,55(1):64-71.[A41]
[20] 刘昆,莫洪柳,刘衍锋,等.复杂环境下路面病害识别模型优化研究[J].公路工程,2024,49(5):106-115,166.
[21] CHATFIELD K,SIMONYAN K,VEDALDI A,et al.Return of the devil in the details:delving deep into convolutional nets[C]//Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference.Glasgow:BMVA Press,2014.
[22] 姚昱,郑洋,程子燚,等.基于Scharr算子的计算鬼成像边缘提取技术[J].激光与光电子学进展,2024,61(10):1011004.
[23] 张晓闻,任勇峰.基于改进HED的多尺度边缘检测方法[J].微电子学与计算机,2021,38(6):1-6,12.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2025.03.006
中图分类号:U446;TP391.41
引用信息:
[1]殷新锋,谈承午,陈勉,等.融合语义分割和边缘提取的DEGUNet桥梁裂缝识别方法[J].公路工程,2025,50(03):53-62+73.DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2025.03.006.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52078057); 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2023JJ30044)
2025-06-20
2025-06-20