| 103 | 9 | 34 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
某地下通道顶管工程施工前,根据地下空间规划已知有规划地铁隧道将从下方穿过。为减少后期盾构下穿施工对顶管通道的不利影响,提出了采用旋喷桩门型加固的方法对顶管通道进行预保护。采用有限元软件对不同预保护方案下盾构下穿施工进行数值模拟,分析了不同预保护方案下顶管通道的变形控制效果。模拟结果表明:旋喷桩门型加固对于顶管通道的变形控制效果显著,顶管通道的沉降变形得到了明显控制;双线盾构隧道穿越后,顶管通道的竖向位移曲线呈“W”型,符合类似工程监测规律;门型加固可以有效减少地表沉降,双线隧道穿越后,地表变形最大处居于隧道中心线正上方。采用水平加固体预保护方案地表沉降为无预保护方案地表沉降的80.8%;采用门型加固预保护方案地表沉降为无预保护方案地表沉降的58.5%。
Abstract:Before the construction of an underground passage pipe jacking project in Hangzhou, it was known that a planned subway tunnel would pass underneath according to the underground space planning. In order to reduce the adverse impact of the shield underpass construction on the pipe jacking channel in the later stage, the method of pre-protection of the pipe jacking channel by using rotary pile portal reinforcement was proposed. The numerical simulation of shield underpass construction under different pre-protection schemes is carried out by finite element software, and the deformation control effect of the roof channel under different pre-protection schemes is analyzed. The simulation results show that: the deformation control effect of rotary pile portal reinforcement on the existing pipe channel is remarkable. The settlement deformation of the pipe channel has been significantly controlled; after the double-line shield tunnel crossing, the vertical displacement curve of the pipe is "W" type, which is in accordance with the monitoring law of similar projects. The portal reinforcement can effectively reduce surface settlement. After the double-lane tunnel crossing, the maximum surface deformation is located directly above the centerline of the tunnel. The surface settlement with horizontal reinforcement pre-protection scheme is 80.8% of that without pre-protection. The surface settlement with the portal reinforcement pre-protection scheme is 58.5% of that without pre-protection.
[1] 于宁,朱合华.盾构隧道施工地表变形分析与三维有限元模拟[J].岩土力学,2004(8):1330-1334.
[2] 王成华,段贤伟.基坑开挖对地下管线工作性状影响的数值分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2013,9(5):1166-1172.
[3] 杨果岳,刘浩航,尹志政,等.顶管上穿施工对地铁隧道的影响[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2014,35(2):57-61.
[4] 张治国,黄茂松,王卫东.邻近开挖对软土隧道的影响[J].岩土力学,2009,30(5):1373-1380.
[5] 张治国,张孟喜.软土城区土压平衡盾构上下交叠穿越地铁隧道的变形预测及施工控制[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增刊2):3428-3439.
[6] 黄磊.盾构隧道下穿LNG高压燃气管影响分析[J].市政技术,2016,34(6):77-83.
[7] 刘文俊,傅鹤林,温树杰,等.近距离下穿施工对矩形顶管通道的影响分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(9):1782-1788.
[8] 张晓清,张孟喜,李林,等.多线叠交盾构隧道近距离穿越施工扰动机制研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(4):1133-1140.
[9] 丁智,吴云双,张霄,等.软土盾构隧道近距离穿越地铁影响数值分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(3):663-671.
[10] 蔡武林.顶管近距离上跨施工对地铁运营区间影响的数值分析[J].土工基础,2018,32(1):42-45.
[11] 杨艳玲,韩现民,李文江.地铁盾构区间近距离下穿顶管隧道力学响应及沉降控制标准研究[J].铁道标准设计,2022,66(3):118-123,149.
[12] 李志南,潘珂,王位赢.并行顶管近距离上穿盾构隧道的安全分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(增刊2):939-944,975.
[13] 沈俊,晏莉,傅金阳,等.叠线盾构隧道并行下穿燃气管线影响分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(增刊1):449-456.
[14] 翟志国,花楠,刘柳.MJS水平旋喷桩在京沈高铁盾构隧道联络通道中的应用[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(增刊2):512-519.
[15] 魏纲,朱奎.顶管施工对邻近地下管线的影响预测分析[J].岩土力学,2009,30(3):825-831.
[16] 魏纲,赵得乾麟,黄睿.盾构施工对邻近隧道影响的模型试验研究综述[J].现代隧道技术,2021,58(5):1-8.
[17] 张林.盾构近距离下穿矩形顶管隧道施工变形规律研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(增刊1):375-381,403.
[18] 魏纲,李志远,崔允亮,等.平行近接新建盾构隧道的综合管廊预保护研究——以富阳区地下综合管廊工程为例[J].结构工程师,2021,37(5):159-168.
[19] 崔允亮,李志远,魏纲,等.上跨拟建隧道的地下综合管廊预保护效果[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2021,55(2):330-337.
[20] 刘卫晴.盾构隧道下穿既有普铁路基施工影响数值模拟分析[J].湖南交通科技,2020,46(1):110-113.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2023.05.004
中图分类号:U455.43;U231.3
引用信息:
[1]史宇光,肖生明,王艳,等.盾构隧道下穿顶管通道预保护方案对比研究[J].公路工程,2023,48(05):21-28.DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2023.05.004.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52178399)
2022-11-07
2022
2023-02-10
2023-02-14
2023
1
2023-10-20
2023-10-20