| 156 | 5 | 32 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为研究压实和干湿循环综合作用下路堤边坡的长期稳定性,基于室内三轴试验与数值仿真分析,以某高速公路路堤段粉土为研究对象,开展了不同干湿循环次数、压实度下的室内三轴剪切试验,获取了不同干湿循环次数下的抗剪强度参数,并将参数导入至数值仿真模型中开展计算分析,获取了干湿循环对潜在滑移面的影响规律,探索了粉土路堤长期稳定性演变特征。研究表明,压实粉土的强度随干湿循环次数增加而减小,以K=0.93为例,经历干湿循环2、4、6、8次后,黏聚力分别下降24.1%、38.4%、44.1%、51.0%,内摩擦角分别下降11.4%、17.5%、21.9%、25.4%;在不同干湿循环次数下,粉土路堤边坡均存在明显的潜在滑移面,同时滑体上还出现了大量剪切裂隙;路堤边坡在填筑初期的安全系数可满足规范要求,但干湿循环会使路堤的稳定性会出现明显降低,K=0.96、0.93、0.90时,经历8次干湿循环后路堤的安全系数分别下降0.878、0.736、0.587,可见在路堤设计时留足安全储备十分必要,在极端气候偏多的环境下更是应该如此;为提升粉土路堤长期稳定性,提高抵抗病害的韧性,应当重视压实质量和排水。研究成果可为粉土路堤安全储备设计提供有益参考。
Abstract:To investigate the long-term stability of embankment slopes subjected to the combined effects of compaction and wet-dry cycles, a study was conducted using a combination of laboratory triaxial tests and numerical simulations. The study focused on silt from a highway embankment section, where triaxial shear tests were performed under various wet-dry cycle frequencies and compaction levels. Shear strength parameters were obtained for different numbers of wet-dry cycles, which were then incorporated into a numerical simulation model for analysis. The effects of wet-dry cycles on potential slip surfaces were identified, and the evolution characteristics of the long-term stability of the silt embankment were explored. The results indicate that the strength of compacted silt decreases with the increase in wet-dry cycles. For instance, at a compaction degree of K=0.93, cohesion decreased by 24.1%、38.4%、44.1% and 51.0%, while the internal friction angle decreased by 11.4%、17.5%、21.9% and 25.4% after 2、4、6 and 8 wet-dry cycles, respectively. Notably, under different wet-dry cycle frequencies, potential slip surfaces were evident in the silt embankment slope, accompanied by numerous shear cracks in the slip body. While the initial safety factor of the embankment slope met the standard requirements, the stability significantly decreased due to wet-dry cycles. For K values of 0.96、0.93 and 0.90, the safety factor of the embankment decreased by 0.878、 0.736 and 0.587, respectively, after 8 wet-dry cycles. This underscores the importance of providing sufficient safety reserves during embankment design, especially in regions prone to extreme climatic conditions. To enhance the long-term stability of silt embankments and increase resilience against degradation, emphasis should be placed on compaction quality and drainage. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for designing safety reserves in silt embankments.
[1] 蒋佳莉,张卫兵,王红雨.干湿循环作用下银川地区重塑粉质黏土强度劣化试验研究[J].公路交通科技,2020,37(5):33-42.
[2] 柳伟,徐长节,胡世韬,等.降雨和库水位升降条件下考虑非饱和渗透系数空间变异的边坡可靠度分析[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2024,46(3):61-72.
[3] 刘文化,舒俊炜,孙秀丽,等.干湿循环作用下固化淤泥的抗剪强度变化规律[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2019,41(4):10-18.
[4] 康馨,赵士成,刘鹏.干湿循环下花岗岩残积土胶结物溶蚀-微结构演化规律与力学行为[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2024,51(1):159-169.
[5] 周锐,王保田,王东英,等.不同干湿条件下中等膨胀土裂隙发展及作用机理分析 [J].农业工程学报,2023,39 (21):98-107.
[6] KUMAR A,SAHOO J P.Impact of wetting-drying cycles on soil-structure interfacial behaviour[J].Géotechnique,2019,69(4),365-375.
[7] SAYEM H M,KONG L W,YIN S.Effect of drying-wetting cycles on saturated shear strength of undisturbed residual soils[J].American Journal of Civil Engineering,2016,4(4):159-166.
[8] STOLTZ G,CUISINIER O,MASROURI F.Weathering of a lime-treated clayey soil by drying and wetting cycles[J].Engineering Geology,2014,181:281-289.
[9] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,等.有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J].岩土力学,2018,39(7):2311-2317.
[10] 吕海波,曾召田,赵艳林,等.胀缩性土强度衰减曲线的函数拟合[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(增刊2):157-162.
[11] 徐彬,殷宗泽,刘述丽.膨胀土强度影响因素与规律的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(1):44-50.
[12] 刘华强,殷宗泽.裂缝对膨胀土抗剪强度指标影响的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(3):727-731.
[13] 袁志辉,倪万魁,唐春,等.干湿循环下黄土强度衰减与结构强度试验研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(7):1894-1902,1942.
[14] 秦育阳.干湿循环下马兰黄土强度及结构性研究[D].西安:长安大学,2020.
[15] 雷卫佳,刘伟煌,涂序龙.干湿循环对非饱和重塑红黏土强度特性影响分析[J].中国水运(下半月),2019,19(11):246-248.
[16] LI Q,ZHANG N.Experimental investigation on the mechanical p-roperties of unsaturated soil subjected to wetting-drying cycles[J].Engineering Geology,2021,281:105953.
[17] CHUNG-SIK Y.Effect of cyclic drying-wetting on compressive strength of decomposed granite soils[J].Journal of Korean Geosynthetics Society,2011,10(4):135-142.
[18] 陈汪洋,刘伟明,胡林杰.干湿循环对高液限花岗岩残积土抗剪强度参数的影响[J].湖南交通科技,2023,49(3):22-25.
[19] 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司.公路工程地质勘察规范:JTGC20—2011[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2011.
[20] 交通运输部公路科学研究院.公路土工试验规程:JTG 3430—2020[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2020.
[21] 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司.公路路基设计规范JTG D30—2015[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2015.
[22] 张连吉,曾亚林,罗晓岚.干湿循环作用下受荷炭质页岩损伤特性与能量特征研究[J].公路工程,2022,47(3):166-171,185.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2024.05.013
中图分类号:U416.12
引用信息:
[1]骆红军,郭一鹏.基于压实与干湿循环综合作用的粉土路堤稳定性演变规律研究[J].公路工程,2024,49(05):93-100.DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2024.05.013.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52008038)
2024-07-30
2024
2024-08-17
2024-08-27
2024
1
2024-08-28
2024-08-28
2024-08-28