nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 02, v.45;No.201 195-199
高地应力状态下软岩公路隧道的大变形机理与规律研究
基金项目(Foundation): 山西省自然科学基金项目(201701D22111223)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2020.02.035
发布时间: 2020-04-20
出版时间: 2020-04-20
移动端阅读
摘要:

高地应力区软岩隧道地质条件复杂,使软岩隧道变形控制难度加大。以某一工程实例为对象,运用MIDAS/GTS软件建立了软岩公路隧道模型,分析了不同侧压力系数下对高地应力软岩隧道开挖变形的影响作用。研究结果表明:随着侧压力系数的增大,隧道围岩水平位移由向隧道外挤压变形转化为向隧道内收敛变形,K值在0.5~0.75时,存在一个水平位移零点,最终水平变形量为0;对于隧道竖向位移变形,当侧压力系数小于1时,隧道最大竖向位移出现在拱顶处。当侧压力系数大于1时,上拱变形加强,但整体依然表现沉降变形,隧道最大竖向位移出现由拱腰转移到拱间处。K值在1附近时,隧道水平变形和拱顶变形所形成的最终变形量相等,可根据现场对水平位移和拱顶位移间的位移关系来判定隧道围岩侧压系数的大致取值范围。

Abstract:

The soft rock tunnel with high ground stress area is difficult to control the deformation control of the soft rock tunnel due to the complicated geological conditions. In this paper, a soft rock highway tunnel model is established by using MIDAS/GTS software, and the effect of different pressure coefficients on the deformation of the high-stress soft rock tunnel is analyzed by using MIDAS/GTS software as the object. The results show that, with the increase of the lateral pressure coefficient, the horizontal displacement of the surrounding rock of the tunnel is converted into the convergent deformation in the tunnel from the outward extrusion deformation to the tunnel, and when the K value is between 0.5 and 0.75, there is a horizontal displacement zero and the final horizontal deformation is 0; for the deformation of the vertical displacement of the tunnel, When the lateral pressure coefficient is less than 1, the maximum vertical position of the tunnel moves out of the present vault. When the lateral pressure coefficient is greater than 1, the upper arch deformation is strengthened, but the whole still shows the settlement deformation, and the maximum vertical displacement of the tunnel appears from the arch waist to the arch space. When the K value is near 1, the final deformation of the tunnel is equal to that of the vault, and the approximate value range of the lateral pressure coefficient of the tunnel surrounding rock can be determined according to the displacement relation between the horizontal displacement and the vault displacement in the field.

参考文献

[1] 于卫云,李伟.基于监控测量的石英片岩区变质岩隧道变形影响因素及机理分析[J].公路工程,2016,41(5):57-61+81.

[2] 丁王飞,邓鑫洁.深部隧道单节理岩体开挖卸荷破裂及锚杆加固研究[J].安全与环境工程,2017,24(1):168-175,182.

[3] 高光彬,饶和根,廖卫平,等.谷竹高速公路片岩隧道二衬开裂机理研究[J].铁道建筑,2017(02):57-59+90.

[4] 吕玉匣,张林.基于围岩流变性的曾家坡软岩隧道稳定性分析[J].铁道建筑,2017(4):60-63.

[5] 王明年,李炬,于丽,等.软岩高地应力对运营铁路隧道影响的有限元分析[J].路基工程,2017(3):204-207.

[6] 魏来,刘钦,黄沛.高地应力软岩隧道大变形机理及控制对策研究综述[J].公路,2017,62(7):297-306.

[7] 薛晓辉,张军,宿钟鸣,等.高地应力软岩隧道大变形失稳机理及支护对策研究[J].公路,2015,60(3):223-228.

[8] 安茂盛,汪波.让压支护技术在软岩大变形隧道中的应用探讨[J].公路交通科技,2015,32(5):115-122.

[9] 季晓明,周先齐,王伟.向家坝大型地下厂房长期稳定性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2012,8(5):1026-1033+1047.

[10] 李国立,郭静芸,王奕辰.深埋公路隧道围岩大变形预测研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2015,11(5):1164-1174.

[11] 王树仁,刘招伟,屈晓红,等.软岩隧道大变形力学机制与刚隙柔层支护技术[J].中国公路学报,2009,22(6):90-95.

[12] 田洪铭,陈卫忠,郑朋强,等.考虑流变效应的高地应力软岩隧道断面形态优化研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(S2):265-271.

[13] 王胜国.高地应力软岩隧道大变形分级标准研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2016(4):40-43.

[14] 李术才,徐飞,李利平,等.隧道工程大变形研究现状、问题与对策及新型支护体系应用介绍[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(7):1366-1376.

[15] 于远祥,陈宝平,张涛,等.基于锚杆受力分析的软岩隧道变形规律及柔模支护技术[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(6):254-263.

[16] 宋青会,高乌兰.考虑地下水影响的软岩隧道力学特性及施工对策研究[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2018,14(8):165-166.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2020.02.035

中图分类号:U456.3

引用信息:

[1]高晓春,张学高.高地应力状态下软岩公路隧道的大变形机理与规律研究[J].公路工程,2020,45(02):195-199.DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2020.02.035.

基金信息:

山西省自然科学基金项目(201701D22111223)

发布时间:

2020-04-20

出版时间:

2020-04-20

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文