| 33 | 0 | 30 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
大量实践表明,高水压岩溶隧道施工发生突涌危害性极大。云南省华丽高速公路营盘山特长隧道属于典型的高压富水岩溶隧道,突泥涌水灾害频发,施工处治难度大、安全风险极高。针对施工过程中遭遇的前所未有的隧道出口端188持续性大规模突涌淹井事件和进口端916、924重大突涌,进行理论研究、方案制定、实践检验与过程总结,提出应对策略和关键技术:1)针对安全岩柱厚度的确定,要采取多种理论进行分析对比,优先采用塑性区贯通准则理论取值2-3倍的安全系数,并结合现场超前试钻探进行综合确定,把握安全合理和经济高效的原则;2)针对188持续性大规模突涌淹井,采取“搁置斜井、正洞高压泄水、分阶段实施、稳步逼近斜井水体”的正洞分阶段高压泄水方法,完成最终泄水,攻克淹井长达两年的降排水难题;3)针对长时间浸水的洞身淹没段的处治,采取“分段分层清渣+临时护拱加固+径向注浆加固,循环作业,逐步推进”的处治措施,安全穿越涌水段。针对初支浸泡和挤压变形处治,采用“台车法”换拱,“微爆破+破碎锤+风镐”三者配合,快速完成换拱处治;4)针对916和924顽固性涌泥涌渣处治,采取横洞迂回,越过不良地质段,正常掘进并反向处治,实现正常掘进。
Abstract:Extensive practice has shown that the occurrence of sudden surges during the construction of high water pressure karst tunnels poses great harm. The Yingpanshan Extra-long Tunnel on the Huali Expressway in Yunnan Province is a typical high-pressure and water-rich karst tunnel, with frequent mud and water inrush disasters, difficult construction and treatment, and extremely high safety risks. In response to the unprecedented large-scale surge flooding event at the exit end 188 of the tunnel and the major surges at the inlet ends 916 and 924 encountered during the construction process, theoretical research, scheme formulation, practical testing, and process summary were conducted to propose response strategies and key technologies: 1) For the determination of safe rock column thickness, multiple theories should be adopted for analysis and comparison, with priority given to using the plastic zone penetration criterion theory with a safety factor of 2-3 times, and combined with on-site advanced trial drilling for comprehensive determination, grasping the principles of safety, rationality, and economic efficiency; 2) In response to the continuous large-scale surge flooding of the 188 well, the method of "shelving the inclined shaft, high-pressure discharge from the main tunnel, phased implementation, and steadily approaching the inclined shaft water body" was adopted to complete the final discharge and overcome the drainage problem of the flooded well that lasted for two years; 3) For the treatment of the submerged section of the tunnel body that has been submerged for a long time, the treatment measures of "segmented and layered slag removal+temporary arch protection reinforcement+radial grouting reinforcement, cyclic operation, gradually advancing" are adopted to safely cross the water inflow section. For the treatment of initial immersion and compression deformation, the "trolley method" is used to replace the arch, and the combination of "micro blasting+crushing hammer+air pick" is used to quickly complete the arch replacement treatment; 4) For the treatment of stubborn mud and slag surges in 916 and 924, a transverse tunnel detour was adopted, crossing the unfavorable geological section, normal excavation was carried out, and reverse treatment was carried out to achieve normal excavation.
[1] 秦鹏飞,赵亚敏,宋梦,王文菁.隧道突泥涌水致灾机理及防控技术研究[J].中国岩溶,2025,44(2):359-369.
[2] 梅卫锋,黎 浩.考虑岩墙厚度的大断面隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J].公路工程,2020,45( 2) : 200 -206.
[3] 郭如军,何发亮.隧道施工突水致灾构造及其分类[J].现代隧道技术,2017,54(1):55-60.
[4] 卓越,高广义.大瑞铁路高黎贡山隧道施工挑战与对策[J].隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(5):810-819.
[5] 肖广智. 我国几类特殊地质条件铁路隧道修建问题与对策概述[J].隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(11):1748-1758.
[6] 李术才,袁永才,李利平,叶志华,张乾青,雷霆. 钻爆施工条件下岩溶隧道掌子面突水机制及最小安全厚度研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(2):313-320.
[7] 房忠栋,杨为民,王旌,石锦江,巴兴之,王浩. 深埋隧道前方承压溶洞隔水岩体最小安全厚度研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(8):2805-2813.
[8] 李集,卢浩,夏沅谱. 岩溶隧道防突安全厚度研究综述及估算方法探讨[J]. 隧道建设,2014,34(9):862-873.
[9] 李治国.高水压富水隧道地下水控制技术探讨[J].隧道建设,2015,35(3):204-209.
[10] 蔡俊华.穿越花岗岩蚀变带隧道的突涌治理措施[J].公路工程,2018,43(2):167-219.
[11] 贾建波,高广义,温兴明.高黎贡山隧道大规模突涌综合治理技术[J].隧道建设,2021,41(7):394-400.
[12] 申志军.宜万铁路岩溶隧道修建关键技术[J].现代隧道技术,2012,49(10):19-24.
[13] 张梅,张民庆,朱鹏飞,黄鸿健.高压富水充填溶腔释能降压技术[J].中国工程科学,2009,11(12):13-19.
[14] 张梅.深埋富水大型溶腔隧道施工技术[J].现代隧道技术,2011,48(6):338-344.
[15] 马栋. 高压富水铁路隧道修建关键技术:隧道施工[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2021:5.
[16] 张旭东,汪海滨,封明君,邓哲,李小春.深释能降压工法在高压富水岩溶隧道风险规避中的应用研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(5):2782-2791.
[17] 张民庆,黄鸿健,张生学,吴军,李谢怀.宜万铁路马鹿箐隧道1·21突水突泥抢险治理技术[J].铁道工程学报,2008,11(11):49-61.
[18] 寇小勇,樊浩博,李芒原,郎志军,张家奎,高新强,郜现磊,朱正国.富水岩溶隧道掌子面安全岩柱厚度研究[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(24):10706-10717.
[19] 眭素刚, 杨艳娜, 黄靖宇, 于斯遥, 王帮团.复杂断块山区隧道涌突水灾害的风险评价模型[J].地下空间与工程学报,2025,21(01):350-357.
[20] 程小勇.基于水文地质综合勘察的隧道导水特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2024,20(04):1345-1356.
[21] Zhijun Lang,Zecheng Ma,Mangyuan Li,Haiyang Qiao.Application and Development of Data Simulation and Mechanical Analysis in Civil Engineering ICCE 2024[M].2025:204–217.
基本信息:
中图分类号:U453.6;P694
引用信息:
[1]郎志军,李芒原,乔海洋,等.营盘山隧道突涌水地质灾害挑战应对与关键技术研究[J].公路工程().
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(51378321)); 住建部科技项目(2021-K-088); 天津市科技计划项目(24JCJQJC00170)
2026-06-24
2026-06-24
2026-06-24