nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 03, v.49 186-194
隧道工程建设碳排放特征与减碳潜力分析
基金项目(Foundation): 浙江省交通投资集团科研项目(202201); 交通运输重点科技项目(2022-MS5-148); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(20230608)
邮箱(Email): gaosh1115@qq.com;
DOI: 10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2024.03.025
投稿时间: 2023-09-27
投稿日期(年): 2023
修回时间: 2023-10-27
终审时间: 2023-12-07
终审日期(年): 2023
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2024-06-20
出版时间: 2024-06-20
移动端阅读
摘要:

为明晰隧道建设碳排放强度及贡献,指导隧道建设低碳转型,基于生命周期评价理论和排放因子法对公路隧道碳排放特征及不同情景下减碳潜力进行量化分析。研究结果表明:公路隧道建设碳排放强度平均值为3.437万t CO_2eq/km,材料生产、现场施工机械及场内材料转运碳排放贡献率分别为88.6%、9.2%和2.2%。碳排放来源主要集中于少数材料和机械,其中水泥、钢筋、冷轧带肋钢筋网、空气压缩机、自卸汽车、轴流式通风机、装载机需要进行重点管控。洞身开挖、洞身衬砌、仰拱、洞内路面碳排放强度较高需重点开展设计施工低碳优化,仰拱、洞身开挖碳排放强度与IV、V级围岩长度呈显著正相关。情景分析得到水泥低碳替代可减少1.83%~10.92%的材料生产碳排放,钢铁低碳替代可减少0.75%~5.99%的材料生产碳排放,电动化工程机械替代可减少3.48%~17.40%的场内运输碳排放和0.5%~2.53%的现场施工机械碳排放。

Abstract:

In order to clarify the carbon emission intensity and contribution of tunnel construction and guide the low-carbon transformation of tunnel construction, the carbon emission characteristics of highway tunnels and carbon reduction potential under different scenarios were quantitatively analyzed based on the life cycle assessment and emission factor method.The results shown that the average carbon emission intensity of highway tunnel construction was 34.370 t CO_2eq/km, the contribution rates of carbon emission of material production, site construction machinery and site material transportation were 88.6%, 9.2% and 2.2% respectively. Carbon emission sources are mainly concentrated in a few materials and machinery. Among which cement, steel bars, cold-rolled ribbed steel mesh, air compressors, dump trucks, axial fans and loaders need to be focused on. Also, the carbon emission intensity of tunnel excavation, tunnel lining, invert arch and pavement in tunnel were relatively high and needs to be focused on low-carbon optimization both design and construction. The carbon emission intensity of invert arch and tunnel excavation is positively correlated with the length of grade-IV and grade-V surrounding rock.Scenario analysis shown that the low-carbon replacement of cement can reduce the carbon emissions of material production by 1.83% to 10.92%, the low-carbon replacement of steel can reduce the carbon emissions of material production by 0.75% to 5.99%, and the replacement of electric construction machinery can reduce the carbon emissions of on-site transportation by 3.48% to 17.40% and the carbon emissions of on-site construction machinery by 0.5% to 2.53%.

参考文献

[1] LI X H,LIU J C,XU H L,et al.Calculation of endogenous carbon dioxide emission during highway tunnel construction:a case study[C]//2011 International Symposium on Water Resource and Environmental Protection,3.Xi'an,China:IEEE,2011:2260-2264.

[2] 徐建峰.公路隧道施工碳排放计算方法及预测模型研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2021.

[3] XU J F,GUO C,YU L.Factors influencing and methods of predicting greenhouse gas emissions from highway tunnel construction in southwestern China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,229:337-349.

[4] HUANG L Z,BOHNE R A,BRULAND A,et al.Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2015,20(2):174-184.

[5] 郭春,徐建峰,张佳鹏.隧道建设碳排放计算方法及预测模型[J].隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(8):1140-1146.

[6] WANG X W,DUAN Z Y,WU L S,et al.Estimation of carbon dioxide emission in highway construction:a case study in southwest region of China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,103:705-714.

[7] GUO C,XU J F,YANG L,et al.Life cycle evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions of a highway tunnel:a case study in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,211:972-980.

[8] XU J F,GUO C,CHEN X F,et al.Emission transition of greenhouse gases with the surrounding rock weakened – a case study of tunnel construction[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,209:169-179.

[9] 陈鑫磊,张学民,陈进,等.基于碳排放评价的超小净距隧道绿色施工优化研究[J].中国公路学报,2022,35(1):59-70.

[10] 周贤舜,张学民,武朝光,等.基于低碳减排的隧道水封爆破优化效果研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2023,20(3):996-1007.

[11] 陈进,鬲浩然,周中书,等.基于碳排放评价的节理化岩体大跨度隧道施工方法比选[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(1):86-91.

[12] 鲍学英,许锟.考虑碳排放的铁路隧道施工机械配置优化模型[J].铁道学报,2020,42(9):157-164.

[13] LIU Y Y,WANG Y Q,LI D.Estimation and uncertainty analysis on carbon dioxide emissions from construction phase of real highway projects in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,144:337-346.

[14] 吴明,姜国强,贾冯睿,等.基于物质流和生命周期分析的石油行业碳排放[J].资源科学,2018,40(6):1287-1296.

[15] 王陶,张志智,孙潇磊.汽油产品碳足迹研究[J].当代化工,2020,49(7):1428-1432,1436.

[16] OU X M,ZHANG X L,CHANG S Y.Scenario analysis on alternative fuel/vehicle for China’s future road transport:Life-cycle energy demand and GHG emissions[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(8):3943-3956.

[17] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366—2019[J].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.

[18] 龚志起,张智慧.建筑材料物化环境状况的定量评价[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(9):1209-1213.

[19] 黄旭辉.地铁土建工程物化阶段碳排放计量与减排分析[J].广州:华南理工大学,2019.

[20] 张红波,陈海涛,徐升,等.橡胶改性沥青混合料路面建设能耗与碳排放评价[J].公路工程,2021,46(3):154-164.

[21] 许建东.机床组焊件制造过程工艺碳排放研究[J].合肥:合肥工业大学,2014.

[22] 郭鸿.建筑陶瓷行业能耗现状及碳排放因子分析[J].陶瓷,2022,(11):54-57.

[23] 郭春,郭亚林,陈政.交通隧道工程碳排放核算及研究进展分析[J].现代隧道技术,2023,60(1):1-10.

[24] 丁美荣.水泥行业碳排放现状分析与减排关键路径探讨[J].中国水泥,2021,(7):46-49.

[25] 陈剑.长短流程能耗和碳排放对比分析[EB/OL].(2022-01-10)[2024-05-06].http://www.cmisi.cn/default/index/newsDetails?newsId=1783.

[26] 颜艳芬,王玉臣,傅鹤林,等.特长公路隧道通风竖井优化研究[J].湖南交通科技,2023,49(2):141-145,179.

[27] 李慧,彭夏清,张静晓.公路生命周期碳排放评估及其敏感性分析[J].公路工程,2021,46(2):132-138.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2024.03.025

中图分类号:U455

引用信息:

[1]陈飞,翁辉,高硕晗,等.隧道工程建设碳排放特征与减碳潜力分析[J].公路工程,2024,49(03):186-194.DOI:10.19782/j.cnki.1674-0610.2024.03.025.

基金信息:

浙江省交通投资集团科研项目(202201); 交通运输重点科技项目(2022-MS5-148); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(20230608)

投稿时间:

2023-09-27

投稿日期(年):

2023

修回时间:

2023-10-27

终审时间:

2023-12-07

终审日期(年):

2023

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2024-06-20

出版时间:

2024-06-20

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文